{"id":28367,"date":"2026-09-16T11:08:13","date_gmt":"2026-09-16T09:08:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/frnix.org\/?page_id=28367"},"modified":"2026-09-16T22:32:49","modified_gmt":"2026-09-16T20:32:49","slug":"article-ixp-commerciaux-ou-associatifs","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/frnix.org\/en\/ressources\/article-ixp-commerciaux-ou-associatifs\/","title":{"rendered":"Article : IXP Commerciaux ou associatifs"},"content":{"rendered":"<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-page\" data-elementor-id=\"28367\" class=\"elementor elementor-28367\" data-elementor-post-type=\"page\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-97722b5 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"97722b5\" data-element_type=\"container\" data-e-type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-206e3bb e-con-full e-flex e-con e-child\" data-id=\"206e3bb\" data-element_type=\"container\" data-e-type=\"container\" data-settings=\"{&quot;background_background&quot;:&quot;classic&quot;,&quot;shape_divider_bottom&quot;:&quot;curve&quot;,&quot;shape_divider_bottom_negative&quot;:&quot;yes&quot;}\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-shape elementor-shape-bottom\" aria-hidden=\"true\" data-negative=\"true\">\n\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewbox=\"0 0 1000 100\" preserveaspectratio=\"none\">\n\t<path class=\"elementor-shape-fill\" d=\"M500,97C126.7,96.3,0.8,19.8,0,0v100l1000,0V1C1000,19.4,873.3,97.8,500,97z\"\/>\n<\/svg>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-ec6de7b elementor-widget__width-inherit elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"ec6de7b\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h1 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Community, commercial or research-based IXPs<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-137b81b elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"137b81b\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h4 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">understand the models without pitting them against one another in order to choose which IXP to connect to<\/h4>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-b6a05db article-blog e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"b6a05db\" data-element_type=\"container\" data-e-type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-1eddbed e-con-full e-flex e-con e-child\" data-id=\"1eddbed\" data-element_type=\"container\" data-e-type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-219e82c elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"219e82c\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<h2>Introduction: IP interconnection (peering, BGP) and the legal status of the organisations that operate them<\/h2><p>An Internet Exchange Point (IXP) is an infrastructure where networks (autonomous systems, or ASNs) connect to exchange IP traffic directly. These may include operators, content providers, public services, large companies or start-ups, though this list is by no means exhaustive. By bringing together networks that wish to connect, it shortens the path taken by data flows, improves latency, creates new routes, and enhances a region\u2019s redundancy and autonomy. The Internet Society (ISOC) points out that an IXP is a physical, neutral location where networks meet to exchange their local traffic.<\/p><p>Some IXPs are set up by associations, others are academic (set up by universities or research organisations), whilst others are private companies. An IXP may also be operated by a private company, which is itself wholly controlled by an association; indeed, this is the most common model in Europe amongst the major IXPs (DE-CIX, AMS-IX, France-IX). Some associations have not deemed it necessary to set up an umbrella organisation and manage their IXP directly. This is the case with LINX in London.<\/p><p>An IXP essentially provides peering (at Layer 2 of the OSI model), but it may also offer Ethernet circuits, cloud connectivity services and Layer 3 routed interconnection. It is generally constrained by issues of competition with its own members\/customers and therefore cannot offer all services without risking competing with, and consequently upsetting, its members\/customers.<\/p><p>This diversity of organisational structures is a enduring feature of the European ecosystem. Euro-IX, the European association of IXPs, was established in 2001 to advance the Internet exchange community, in particular through the sharing of knowledge, procedures, statistics and common practices. For its part, ISOC emphasises that commercial, non-profit and community-based models cater to different situations and bring specific benefits to their respective environments.<\/p><p>Editorial perspective. This article does not seek to identify a \u00abbest\u00bb model. It offers a framework for analysis: understanding who controls the infrastructure, who operates it, what services it provides and under what rules, and then examining the practical consequences of these choices.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/lire_un_modele_ixp.png\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-28384 size-custom-1200\" style=\"max-width: 100%;\" src=\"https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/lire_un_modele_ixp-1200x215.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"800\" height=\"143\" srcset=\"https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/lire_un_modele_ixp-1200x215.png 1200w, https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/lire_un_modele_ixp-300x54.png 300w, https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/lire_un_modele_ixp-2048x368.png 2048w, https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/lire_un_modele_ixp-768x138.png 768w, https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/lire_un_modele_ixp-1536x276.png 1536w, https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/lire_un_modele_ixp-18x3.png 18w, https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/lire_un_modele_ixp-600x108.png 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><\/a><br \/><br \/>Figure 1. A single platform can combine features relating to monitoring, operations, services and governance rules. Source: FRNIX literature review, 4 September 2026.<\/p><h2>Four questions to ask before classifying an IXP<\/h2><h3>1. Who is in charge of the organisation?<\/h3><p>The first question concerns the decision-making centre.<\/p><ul><li>In an associative or collective model, the members \u2013 whether a professional association, a consortium or a foundation \u2013 determine the organisation\u2019s direction.<\/li><li>In a public or academic model, the infrastructure is managed by a university, a national research and education network, or a public body.<\/li><li>In a business model, the decision is taken by a single entity, usually a telecoms operator itself, or a data centre with private shareholders.<\/li><\/ul><p>However, a company (such as DE-CIX Group AG, France-IX SASU or AMS-IX BV) may be an operational structure suited to entering into contracts, recruiting staff or attracting investment, without its share capital being held by private investors. The legal form alone is not proof of the nature of governance.<\/p><h3>2. Who is responsible for the technical and commercial operation of the platform?<\/h3><p>Operations may be managed directly, for example by a university or a voluntary organisation. They may also be outsourced to a subsidiary or a specialist service provider. This covers network engineering, monitoring, support, colocation agreements, equipment procurement and customer relations.<\/p><p>The case of France-IX clearly illustrates this separation. FRNIX is a not-for-profit association; it wholly owns France-IX Services SASU, the operator of the France-IX IXP, and retains responsibility for major decisions. The company ensures professional operation, with a strategic committee comprising representatives of the association and independent directors.<\/p><h3>3. What does the infrastructure actually provide?<\/h3><p>The traditional foundation is a Layer 2 peering fabric, over which members exchange traffic in accordance with a peering policy and common technical rules. Many platforms then enhance this foundation with remote access, Ethernet services, private interconnection, cloud connectivity or security mechanisms.<\/p><p>The classification requires even greater precision when a platform does not rely exclusively on a peering LAN. Hopus, for example, is described as an interconnection service offering IP transit with a set of routes and traffic-based pricing, operated by HOPUS SAS in Marseille. It is therefore appropriate to mention it in an analysis of interconnection, but without automatically placing it on the same level as a traditional L2 IXP in governance statistics.<\/p><h3>4. What rules govern participation?<\/h3><p>Practical governance is reflected in the articles of association, member representation, voting rights, the composition of the board of directors, authorised peering policies, access rules, safeguards against discrimination, and transparency regarding tariffs or performance indicators. The word \u00abneutral\u00bb is important in the sector, but it must not become a mere shorthand: neutrality is the result of rules, technical practices and accountability mechanisms, rather than a single legal label.<\/p><p>An IXP controlled by a 100 % private shareholder who is themselves a telecoms operator should be subject to particular scrutiny to ensure compliance with the policies mentioned above (non-discrimination, equality of members). Particular attention may be paid to financial stability, transparency and, as a last resort, the beneficial owners. What would happen to the IXP if the telecoms operator that owns it were to change hands?<\/p><p>The same applies to private companies that simply operate an IXP. In fact, these are generally multi-point IXPs that provide inter-city transport, rather than local peering.<\/p><h2>A comprehensive overview of the European corpus<\/h2><p>Based on the initial data, public information from 38 separate European platforms was verified and then categorised according to effective control or governance, rather than solely on the basis of the operator\u2019s legal form. ECIX and MegaIX are consolidated, as the former ECIX brand has been integrated into Megaport. Hopus is included in the qualitative analysis but excluded from this count, as its offering is presented as a routed interconnection and a Layer 3 IP transit service.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/repartition_modeles_ixp_legend_fix_ai.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-28382 size-custom-1200\" style=\"max-width: 100%;\" src=\"https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/repartition_modeles_ixp_legend_fix_ai-1200x675.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"800\" height=\"450\" srcset=\"https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/repartition_modeles_ixp_legend_fix_ai-1200x675.png 1200w, https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/repartition_modeles_ixp_legend_fix_ai-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/repartition_modeles_ixp_legend_fix_ai-2048x1152.png 2048w, https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/repartition_modeles_ixp_legend_fix_ai-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/repartition_modeles_ixp_legend_fix_ai-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/repartition_modeles_ixp_legend_fix_ai-18x10.png 18w, https:\/\/frnix.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/repartition_modeles_ixp_legend_fix_ai-600x338.png 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><\/a><\/p><p>Figure 2. Breakdown across a corpus of 38 platforms. This figure depicts the sample analysed, and does not represent a ranking by traffic, number of members or economic significance.<\/p><p>The breakdown shows that the majority of models in this sample are collective or foundation-based, supplemented by a substantial number of academic or public infrastructures and by commercially operated platforms. This chart does not indicate the relative size of the organisations, the quality of their services, or the maturity of their security policies. It merely reflects the governance structure at a given point in time.<\/p><p>It was noted, however, that the main European players are either associations with an operational structure in the form of a company, or are managed directly by the association or foundation.<\/p><table width=\"100%\"><thead><tr><td width=\"120\">Family included in the corpus<\/td><td width=\"120\">Number of platforms<\/td><td width=\"120\">Approximate figure<\/td><td width=\"120\">What the category describes<\/td><td width=\"121\">Representative examples<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td width=\"120\">Collective control or foundation<\/td><td width=\"120\">18<\/td><td width=\"120\">47 %<\/td><td width=\"120\">Members, an association, a consortium or a non-profit foundation determine the direction.<\/td><td width=\"121\">AMS-IX, DE-CIX, LINX, France-IX, MIX, Namex.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"120\">Academic or public<\/td><td width=\"120\">10<\/td><td width=\"120\">26 %<\/td><td width=\"120\">University, research network, public body or intergovernmental organisation.<\/td><td width=\"121\">VIX, SFINX, BNIX, GR-IX, CATNIX.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"120\">Subsidiary of a telecoms operator or data centre<\/td><td width=\"120\">5<\/td><td width=\"120\">13 %<\/td><td width=\"120\">Control lies with a telecoms group, a data centre or its subsidiary.<\/td><td width=\"121\">Equinix IX, NL-ix, MSK-IX, Thinx, Eurasia Peering.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"120\">Independent private company<\/td><td width=\"120\">5<\/td><td width=\"120\">13 %<\/td><td width=\"120\">An independent private company or group exercising control.<\/td><td width=\"121\">MegaIX, NetIX, DATAIX, Piter-IX, Nine-IX.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><p>Statistical caveat. The traffic, membership and capacity statistics published by IXPs do not always cover the same scope, the same date or the same measurement method. They are useful for describing a platform, but should not be aggregated without a common protocol. Euro-IX provides the IXPDB as a reference resource for exploring the data published by IXPs.<\/p><h2>Associative, collective and foundation models<\/h2><h3>The principle: the infrastructure is organised around its stakeholders<\/h3><p>In an associative or collective model, the IXP is generally conceived as an infrastructure shared by a community of operators, content providers, hosting providers, businesses and institutions. Members elect a board, vote at general meetings, help shape policy and develop the collective rules. Depending on the circumstances, the organisation may take the form of an association, a de facto co-operative, a company limited by guarantee, a consortium, a public interest group (GIP), an economic interest group (GIE) or a foundation that owns an operating company.<\/p><p>AMS-IX is thus described as a not-for-profit association whose members control AMS-IX B.V. through a general meeting and a board of directors. LINX is a non-profit mutual organisation, owned by its members in the form of a UK company limited by guarantee. NIX.CZ is a non-profit association of legal entities, administered collectively by its members.<\/p><p>This group is not homogeneous. MIX is an Italian limited liability company (S.r.l.) whose share capital is divided between operators and the AIIP association, with a statutory restriction designed to prevent any single shareholder from gaining a controlling stake. Netnod is a Swedish company wholly owned by the non-profit foundation TU-stiftelsen. EPIX operates within an architecture linked to the e-Po\u0142udnie association, which brings together, in particular, small and medium-sized operators in Poland.<\/p><table width=\"100%\"><thead><tr><td width=\"150\">IXP<\/td><td width=\"150\">Control architecture<\/td><td width=\"150\">Type of operation or distinctive feature<\/td><td width=\"150\">Governance education<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td width=\"150\">DE-CIX<\/td><td width=\"150\">eco, the Internet industry association, is the sole shareholder of DE-CIX Group AG.<\/td><td width=\"150\">Operating group in the form of a general meeting.<\/td><td width=\"150\">A company may remain under the control of an association.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">France-IX<\/td><td width=\"150\">FRNIX, a non-profit organisation, is the sole shareholder of France-IX Services SASU.<\/td><td width=\"150\">Operating company with a strategic committee.<\/td><td width=\"150\">Separating the association from the operator can help to clarify roles.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">AMS-IX<\/td><td width=\"150\">The AMS-IX Association and member oversight.<\/td><td width=\"150\">AMS-IX B.V. as the operating company.<\/td><td width=\"150\">The association may manage a dedicated subsidiary.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">LINX<\/td><td width=\"150\">A mutual organisation owned by its members. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.linx.net\/governance\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7<\/a><\/td><td width=\"150\">Company limited by guarantee.<\/td><td width=\"150\">A legal form without a traditional share capital can support a member-based model.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">MIX<\/td><td width=\"150\">Shareholding is distributed amongst and capped for sector participants.<\/td><td width=\"150\">Italian limited liability company.<\/td><td width=\"150\">A corporate structure may provide for multiple forms of control.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">Netnod<\/td><td width=\"150\">TU-stiftelsen Foundation.<\/td><td width=\"150\">Netnod AB.<\/td><td width=\"150\">The foundation model separates mission and operations.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><h3>What this model aims to organise<\/h3><p>The primary objective is often to ensure balanced representation of members and the continuity of an infrastructure regarded as belonging to an ecosystem. IXPs are often regarded as common goods at their respective levels, whether regional or national. This can foster collectively discussed decision-making processes, a perception of neutrality stemming from the absence of control by a single operator, and close ties with the local technical community.<\/p><p>However, it does not automatically imply simple administration or unlimited financial resources. Member-led governance must strike a balance between the speed of decision-making, diversity of interests, the rotation of directors, infrastructure funding and the development of the service portfolio. An effective collective structure therefore depends on the quality of its articles of association, its operational execution and its dialogue with connected networks, not on its status alone.<\/p><p>This model, on the other hand, ensures that the views of members and customers can be heard and taken into account in decisions regarding the management of the IXP or the introduction of new services.<\/p><p>A key distinguishing feature of the association model is that it is virtually impossible to resell the IXP. Any association that were to sell the IXP would lose its raison d\u2019\u00eatre and would struggle to make use of the proceeds, unless the IXP were sold off in bankruptcy, which is rare.<\/p><h3>The particularly instructive case of DE-CIX<\/h3><p>DE-CIX is often too hastily classified as a commercial organisation because of DE-CIX Group AG, perhaps due to its full name in German: Deutscher Commercial Internet Exchange. However, its own corporate presentation explicitly states that the group\u2019s sole shareholder is ECO, the Internet industry association. To analyse its governance, it is therefore necessary to distinguish between the corporate vehicle and the shareholder structure and control mechanisms.<\/p><p>The same interpretation applies to France-IX. FRNIX explains that France-IX Services SASU was set up to ensure the professional operation and management of the IXP, whilst the shareholder association retains control over major decisions. In both cases, the article does not conclude that one model is superior to the other. It notes that hybrid structures combining collective governance with a corporate operational organisation appear to be the dominant model in Europe.<\/p><h2>Academic, public and research models<\/h2><h3>An infrastructure initiative serving a national or regional ecosystem<\/h3><p>Several European IXPs have been established or are operated within the academic, research and public administration sectors. Their purpose may be to support national interconnection, ensure quality of service for teaching and research, or pool resources for the benefit of a region. Their institutional framework can provide them with a particular degree of stability, whilst ensuring that decisions are made in accordance with the rules of a public institution or body.<\/p><p>VIX is operated by the University of Vienna\u2019s central IT department. SFINX is integrated into RENATERIX and operated by GIP RENATER. NIX in Norway is operated by the University of Oslo\u2019s IT centre. SIX.SI is managed by ARNES, the Slovenian academic and research network.<\/p><p>Other examples serve as a reminder that the term \u00abpublic\u00bb also encompasses a variety of different situations. BNIX is operated by Belnet, the Belgian research and education network. GigaPIX falls under the remit of the FCCN unit of the Funda\u00e7\u00e3o para a Ci\u00eancia e a Tecnologia in Portugal. CATNIX is operated by the public consortium CSUC in Catalonia, whilst the CIXP is an exchange infrastructure linked to CERN.<\/p><table width=\"100%\"><thead><tr><td width=\"201\">IXP<\/td><td width=\"201\">Institutional anchoring<\/td><td width=\"201\">Organisational implications to be considered<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td width=\"201\">VIX<\/td><td width=\"201\">University of Vienna.<\/td><td width=\"201\">The IXP functions form part of a university organisation.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"201\">SFINX<\/td><td width=\"201\">GIP RENATER and the RENATERIX service.<\/td><td width=\"201\">The infrastructure is linked to the national research network.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"201\">NIX<\/td><td width=\"201\">University of Oslo.<\/td><td width=\"201\">The operation is the responsibility of a university department.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"201\">BNIX<\/td><td width=\"201\">Belnet, the Belgian national research network.<\/td><td width=\"201\">Management is the responsibility of a public network operator.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"201\">CATNIX<\/td><td width=\"201\">Consortium of University Services of Catalonia.<\/td><td width=\"201\">A consortium comprising public universities and local authorities is responsible for the infrastructure.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"201\">CIXP<\/td><td width=\"201\">CERN.<\/td><td width=\"201\">The context is that of an intergovernmental research organisation.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><p>A public or academic IXP is not necessarily fixed in nature or limited to a particular type of participant. Access conditions, peering policies and technical offerings vary from organisation to organisation. Similarly, it would be simplistic to assume that a university background implies greater or lesser neutrality. Here again, effective governance, access rules and operational commitments are the decisive factors.<\/p><h2>Business models and operators\u2019 subsidiaries<\/h2><h3>An integrated platform approach or a specialised growth strategy<\/h3><p>In a commercial model, the IXP is operated and controlled by a private company, a telecoms operator, a group of data centres or a listed company. This setup may form part of a wider range of services, including colocation, cloud connectivity, private interconnection, remote access, Ethernet services, security, international backbone or managed services.<\/p><p>Equinix Internet Exchange forms part of the global offering of Equinix, a listed data centre group. NL-ix has been part of KPN since its acquisition in 2011. MSK-IX is controlled by Rostelecom via RTComm.RU. Thinx is operated by Atman, a Polish data centre and connectivity provider. Eurasia Peering is operated by an entity within the IXcellerate group.<\/p><p>Other platforms are operated by specialist private companies. MegaIX, which builds on the legacy of ECIX in Europe, is part of Megaport, a group listed on the Australian stock exchange. NetIX is a platform operated by Neterra, a Bulgarian connectivity provider. DATAIX and Piter-IX are operated by private companies within the Russian ecosystem.<\/p><table width=\"100%\"><thead><tr><td width=\"150\">Platform<\/td><td width=\"150\">Type of audit<\/td><td width=\"150\">Public positioning as described by the operator<\/td><td width=\"150\">Analytical control point<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td width=\"150\">Equinix IX<\/td><td width=\"150\">Listed data centre group.<\/td><td width=\"150\">Internet exchange integrated into the Equinix ecosystem.<\/td><td width=\"150\">Distinguish between the IX and the act of sharing accommodation itself.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">NL-ix<\/td><td width=\"150\">A subsidiary of KPN.<\/td><td width=\"150\">IXP distributed across Europe.<\/td><td width=\"150\">Examine the practical mechanisms for independence and access.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">MSK-IX<\/td><td width=\"150\">A subsidiary controlled by Rostelecom.<\/td><td width=\"150\">A multi-service platform for the Russian market.<\/td><td width=\"150\">Do not reduce the quality of service to a matter of shareholder status.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">MegaIX \/ ECIX<\/td><td width=\"150\">Megaport, a listed company.<\/td><td width=\"150\">Distributed exchange and on-demand interconnection.<\/td><td width=\"150\">Distinguishing the ECIX legacy from the consolidated platform.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">NetIX<\/td><td width=\"150\">Affiliated with Neterra, a telecoms operator in Bulgaria.<\/td><td width=\"150\">Distributed IXP and international connectivity.<\/td><td width=\"150\">Separate the IXP business from the group\u2019s other services.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">Nine-IX<\/td><td width=\"150\">A French company affiliated with MOJI.<\/td><td width=\"150\">European IXP and Ethernet fabric.<\/td><td width=\"150\">The model combines L2 fabric with complementary services.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><p>Private ownership does not prejudge either the openness of the platform or the intensity of potential competition between the IXP and its own members\/customers. It may facilitate a rapid roll-out strategy, service integration or direct capital raising, but it also raises its own issues: coordination with the group\u2019s other business lines, pricing transparency, portability, management of potential conflicts of interest and clarity regarding neutrality commitments. These are legitimate concerns for any interconnection provider, regardless of its business model.<\/p><p>In such a model, however, it is the interests of the original shareholder (transport network, data centre) that will ultimately take precedence in determining the direction the IXP takes, and the views of members and customers are not always taken into account.<\/p><h2>Compare models using common criteria<\/h2><p>The comparison becomes more robust when it is based on identical questions for all organisational forms. The following table does not rank the models. It highlights the issues that a network, a potential member, a community or an observer of the ecosystem should consider.<\/p><table width=\"100%\"><thead><tr><td width=\"150\">Criterion<\/td><td width=\"150\">Questions to ask in the context of an association, a collective or a foundation<\/td><td width=\"150\">Questions to ask in an academic or public context<\/td><td width=\"150\">Questions to ask in a business or private context<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td width=\"150\">Control<\/td><td width=\"150\">Who is eligible to vote, and what are the voting weights? How are the directors elected?<\/td><td width=\"150\">What is institutional oversight? What is the service mandate?<\/td><td width=\"150\">Who owns the company and how are decisions made?<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">Operation<\/td><td width=\"150\">Is the operator in-house, a subsidiary or outsourced?<\/td><td width=\"150\">Which teams and budgets ensure continuity?<\/td><td width=\"150\">How does the IXP relate to the group\u2019s other business areas?<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">Neutrality and access<\/td><td width=\"150\">What peering, membership and pricing policies apply?<\/td><td width=\"150\">Are the rules available to all eligible networks?<\/td><td width=\"150\">What mechanisms ensure that the IXP remains independent of related commercial interests?<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">Investment<\/td><td width=\"150\">How are renewals, extensions and innovations funded?<\/td><td width=\"150\">What is the budgetary and administrative timeframe?<\/td><td width=\"150\">What is the pace of investment and how sustainable is the provision?<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">Services<\/td><td width=\"150\">Which services complement peering without altering its rules?<\/td><td width=\"150\">Does the remit also cover research and teaching requirements?<\/td><td width=\"150\">What integrated services are on offer, and what are the terms and conditions?<\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\">Transparency<\/td><td width=\"150\">Where can I find articles of association, minutes, awards and statistics?<\/td><td width=\"150\">Which public indicators can be used for evaluation?<\/td><td width=\"150\">What contractual commitments, indicators and non-discrimination rules are published?<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><p>The operator\u2019s status is therefore merely a starting point. An association may carry out commercial service activities. A company may be owned by an association. A research network may host a highly diverse community of participants. A commercial operator may publish an open peering policy and provide robust technical guarantees. A useful comparison focuses on observable facts.<\/p><h2>Size, traffic and coverage: essential indicators, but they need to be put into context<\/h2><p>Technical indicators remain essential. The number of networks, peak traffic, port capacity, number of sites, ecosystem density, ASN diversity and the presence of content providers all provide insight into a platform\u2019s dynamics. However, a direct comparison requires specifying the scope and date.<\/p><p>For example, the public dashboards of DE-CIX, AMS-IX, LINX and France-IX allow you to track indicators at high frequency or by site. However, a peak figure in Frankfurt cannot automatically be compared with an aggregate multi-site figure; the number of members may refer to customers, ASNs, active ports or organisations, depending on the platform; and total installed capacity does not measure the traffic actually exchanged.<\/p><p>Best practice therefore involves publishing each indicator alongside its definition, date, geographical scope and source. In a governance article, traffic figures serve as individual examples rather than a verdict on the models. Euro-IX\u2019s IXPDB and PeeringDB are valuable supplements for cross-checking data published directly by the platforms, provided that their respective updates and conventions are taken into account.<\/p><h2>What the coexistence of European IXP models reveals<\/h2><p>Europe, like other regions of the world, does not have a single interconnection architecture. It brings together large community organisations, long-established public and academic bodies, IXPs linked to telecoms operators, platforms backed by data centres, as well as private companies specialising in the \u2018fabric\u2019 and distributed interconnection.<\/p><p>This diversity can be interpreted as a capacity for adaptation. In very dense markets, several IXPs may coexist, each with different positioning, topologies and policies. In areas where the ecosystem is still emerging, support may come from a community of operators, a university or a national research network. Private groups may offer integration through colocation, cloud and Ethernet services, whilst member-based organisations may provide direct representation of the local ecosystem.<\/p><p>ISOC emphasises that no single architecture is universal: different regions benefit from different models, whether commercial, not-for-profit or community-based. The conclusion, therefore, is not to choose an abstract status, but to assess the fit between a market context, a community of networks, funding constraints, resilience objectives and the services required.<\/p><h2>Conclusion: prioritise accuracy over quick categorisation<\/h2><p>Describing IXPs as merely \u00abnon-profit\u00bb or \u00abcommercial\u00bb is convenient, but insufficient. The relevant distinction encompasses at least four dimensions: control, operation, services and governance rules. It helps to explain why DE-CIX or France-IX can be operated by companies whilst being controlled by associations, why VIX or SFINX fall under the remit of academic and public organisations, why Equinix IX, NL-ix, Nine-IX, MSK-IX or Thinx are owned by private groups or operators, and why Hopus requires a specific interpretation of its scope of service.<\/p><p>This clarification safeguards the debate from two pitfalls. The first is to equate society with private control without further thought. The second is to automatically associate a status with technical quality, effective neutrality or a capacity for innovation. In practice, these qualities are built through public regulations, a robust infrastructure, competent teams, consistent investment and a relationship of trust with the connected networks.<\/p><p>For those involved in interconnection, the right question is therefore not \u00abwhich model should we choose?\u00bb. Rather, it is: which model for control, operation and services is the most transparent and best suited to the need in question, and what concrete safeguards are in place to assess it?<\/p><p>Once these points have been understood, it is easier to choose the type of IXP to which you wish to connect.<\/p><h2>List of IXPs mentioned<\/h2><h3><strong>IXP: Voluntary Organisations or Collectives \/ Foundations<\/strong><\/h3><table width=\"416\"><thead><tr><td width=\"219\">IXP<\/td><td width=\"197\">Website<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>AMS-IX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ams-ix.net\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ams-ix.net<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>DE-CIX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.de-cix.net\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">de-cix.net<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>LINX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linx.net\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">linx.net<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>France-IX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.franceix.net\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">franceix.net<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>MIX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mix-it.net\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">mix-it.net<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>Namex<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.namex.it\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">namex.it<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>NIX.CZ<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nix.cz\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">nix.cz<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>EPIX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.epix.pl\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">epix.pl<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>Netnod<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.netnod.se\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">netnod.se<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><h3><strong>Academic or Public IXPs<\/strong><\/h3><table width=\"416\"><thead><tr><td width=\"219\">IXP<\/td><td width=\"197\">Website<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>VIX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vix.at\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">vix.at<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>SFINX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfinx.fr\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">sfinx.fr<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>BNIX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bnix.be\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">bnix.be<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>GR-IX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.gr-ix.gr\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">gr-ix.gr<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>CATNIX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.catnix.cat\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">catnix.cat<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>NIX (Norway)<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nix.no\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">nix.no<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>SIX.SI<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.six.si\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">six.si<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>GigaPIX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.gigapix.pt\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">gigapix.pt<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>CIXP (CERN)<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/home.cern\/resources\/it\/network\/services\/cixp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">cixp.cern<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><h3><strong>IXPs, Commercial Entities or Subsidiaries of Operators\/Data Centres<\/strong><\/h3><table width=\"416\"><thead><tr><td width=\"219\">IXP<\/td><td width=\"197\">Website<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>Equinix IX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.equinix.com\/services\/interconnection\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">equinix.com\/services\/interconnection<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>NL-ix<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nl-ix.net\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">nl-ix.net<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>MSK-IX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.msk-ix.ru\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">msk-ix.ru<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>Thinx<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thinx.net\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">thinx.net<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>Eurasia Peering<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/eurasiapeering.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">eurasiapeering.com<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>MegaIX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.megaix.net\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">megaix.net<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>NetIX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.netix.net\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">netix.net<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>DATAIX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dataix.ru\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">dataix.ru<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>Peter IX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.piter-ix.ru\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">piter-ix.ru<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>Nine-IX<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nine-ix.net\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">nine-ix.net<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><h3><strong>Others (hybrid or specialised models)<\/strong><\/h3><table width=\"416\"><thead><tr><td width=\"219\">IXP<\/td><td width=\"197\">Website<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td width=\"219\"><strong>Hopus<\/strong><\/td><td width=\"197\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hopus.net\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">hopus.net<br \/><\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>IXP associatifs, commerciaux ou issus de la recherche comprendre les mod\u00e8les sans les opposer pour choisir sur quel IXP se connecter Introduction : l\u2019interconnexion IP (peering, BGP) et le statut juridique des structures qui les op\u00e8rent Un point d\u2019\u00e9change internet, Internet Exchange Point en anglais, ou IXP, est une infrastructure au sein de laquelle des [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":351,"featured_media":0,"parent":304,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"hf_cat_page":[463],"class_list":["post-28367","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/frnix.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/28367","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/frnix.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/frnix.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/frnix.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/351"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/frnix.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28367"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/frnix.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/28367\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28393,"href":"https:\/\/frnix.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/28367\/revisions\/28393"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/frnix.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/304"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/frnix.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28367"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"hf_cat_page","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/frnix.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hf_cat_page?post=28367"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}